↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005393.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathleen J Lumb, Patrick H.D. Colquhoun, Richard Malthaner, Shiva Jayaraman

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 39 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 44 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,387,249
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,415
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,540
of 84,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.