↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005393.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathleen J Lumb, Patrick H.D. Colquhoun, Richard Malthaner, Shiva Jayaraman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 18 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,723,152
of 16,936,654 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,282
of 11,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,019
of 294,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#170
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,936,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.