↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Electrical stimulation for faecal incontinence in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Electrical stimulation for faecal incontinence in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001310.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gordon Hosker, June D Cody, Christine C Norton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 19%
Psychology 10 11%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 20 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,403,282
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,629
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,332
of 272,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#157
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.