↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Electrical stimulation for faecal incontinence in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Electrical stimulation for faecal incontinence in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001310.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gordon Hosker, June D Cody, Christine C Norton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 104 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 29 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 17%
Psychology 10 10%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 33 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,434,540
of 22,457,522 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,795
of 12,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,581
of 66,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,457,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.