↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for thermal burns

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for thermal burns
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004727.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elmer Villanueva, Michael H Bennett, Jason Wasiak, Jan P Lehm

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 78 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 13 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2020.
All research outputs
#9,817,723
of 17,088,208 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,391
of 11,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,317
of 294,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#197
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,088,208 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.