↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Blood pressure control for diabetic retinopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
Title
Blood pressure control for diabetic retinopathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006127.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana V Do, Xue Wang, Satyanarayana S Vedula, Michael Marrone, Gina Sleilati, Barbara S Hawkins, Robert N Frank

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy is a common complication of diabetes and a leading cause of visual impairment and blindness. Research has established the importance of blood glucose control to prevent development and progression of the ocular complications of diabetes. Simultaneous blood pressure control has been advocated for the same purpose, but findings reported from individual studies have supported varying conclusions regarding the ocular benefit of interventions on blood pressure.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 276 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 16%
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Student > Postgraduate 25 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Other 55 20%
Unknown 62 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Psychology 9 3%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 69 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#942,431
of 19,441,086 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,309
of 11,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,679
of 308,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,441,086 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.