24 followers
2,700 followers
Our Cochrane Review of similar experiments revealed under‐detection of AEs with general questioning that may yet be important clinically & to patients, but impact of question type on AE severity & relatedness is unclear https://t.co/2aZTyY8bJ0
294 followers
「医薬品の有害事象に関する情報を収集するために臨床試験参加者に健康状態について質問すること」に関するコクランレビューの日本語要約です。症状に関する自由回答式質問とチェックリスト型質問の併用を示唆する結果です。 #CochraneDatabaseOfSystematicReviews #メタ疫学 https://t.co/Mb1NTwSPPW
1,317 followers
RT @CochraneUK: "The way participants are asked about their health can vary from trial to trial, or even within a trial...these different k…
2,180 followers
RT @CochraneUK: "The way participants are asked about their health can vary from trial to trial, or even within a trial...these different k…
1,043 followers
RT @CochraneUK: "The way participants are asked about their health can vary from trial to trial, or even within a trial...these different k…
96 followers
RT @CochraneUK: "The way participants are asked about their health can vary from trial to trial, or even within a trial...these different k…
0 followers
RT @CochraneUK: Questioning clinical trial participants about their health in order to collect information on adverse effects of drugs: htt…
729 followers
RT @CochraneUK: Questioning clinical trial participants about their health in order to collect information on adverse effects of drugs: htt…
2,581 followers
RT @CochraneUK: Getting adverse effects data from trial partcipants. "This review supports concerns that methods to elicit participant-repo…
1,587 followers
RT @CochraneUK: Getting adverse effects data from trial partcipants. "This review supports concerns that methods to elicit participant-repo…
3,164 followers
RT @CochraneUK: Getting adverse effects data from trial partcipants. "This review supports concerns that methods to elicit participant-repo…
1,188 followers
Eliciting adverse effects (AE) data from participants in clinical trials @CochraneLibrary https://t.co/fLrq7fZoaY This supports concerns that methods to elicit participant-reported AEs influence the detection of them. There is a risk for under-detection of
50 followers
RT @CochraneHTN: Newly published Cochrane Review: Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials https://t.co/0QlUqWlE…
3,487 followers
RT @CochraneHTN: Newly published Cochrane Review: Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials https://t.co/0QlUqWlE…
427 followers
RT @CochraneHTN: Newly published Cochrane Review: Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials https://t.co/0QlUqWlE…
6,269 followers
Newly published Cochrane Review: Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials https://t.co/0QlUqWlE2O #CochraneEvidence #ptsafety #drugsafety @cochranecollab
579 followers
RT @evidpediatria: Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials https://t.co/kNHjUTgNQU via @CochraneUK
22,175 followers
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials https://t.co/kNHjUTgNQU via @CochraneUK
2,024 followers
Ever tried to synthesise adverse event data across trials? 😱. Many issues preventing reliable meta-analysis of harm outcomes. Here is a new paper highlighting one of them - eliciting reliable and comparable information from patients. https://t.co/GawXFzHEW
299 followers
Questioning clinical trial participants about their health in order to collect information… https://t.co/AA8OarAxuF
19 followers
"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews"[Journal] OR "The Cochrane library"[Journal… https://t.co/yMCIF27btq
1,885 followers
RT @tlassers: In harms way? New @CochraneLibrary review examines impact of different methods to elicit adverse events in clinical research…
2,416 followers
RT @tlassers: In harms way? New @CochraneLibrary review examines impact of different methods to elicit adverse events in clinical research…
2,581 followers
RT @tlassers: In harms way? New @CochraneLibrary review examines impact of different methods to elicit adverse events in clinical research…
545 followers
RT @tlassers: In harms way? New @CochraneLibrary review examines impact of different methods to elicit adverse events in clinical research…
2,880 followers
RT @tlassers: In harms way? New @CochraneLibrary review examines impact of different methods to elicit adverse events in clinical research…
30,867 followers
RT @tlassers: In harms way? New @CochraneLibrary review examines impact of different methods to elicit adverse events in clinical research…
2,319 followers
In harms way? New @CochraneLibrary review examines impact of different methods to elicit adverse events in clinical research https://t.co/XZAcMCrtPl