| Title |
Dopamine transporter imaging for the diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010633.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jenny McCleery, Shirlony Morgan, Kevin M Bradley, Anna H Noel‐Storr, Olaf Ansorge, Chris Hyde |
| Abstract |
Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a common cause of neurodegenerative dementia of old age. Its accurate recognition can be important in clinical management and is essential for the development of disease-modifying treatments. The current clinical diagnostic criteria are limited particularly by relatively poor sensitivity. Dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the most highly developed supplementary test for DLB, and is now incorporated as a suggestive feature in the consensus diagnostic criteria. However, there is uncertainty about its accuracy and its place in clinical practice. It is most commonly used in people who are already suspected of having DLB. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 248 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 13% |
| Researcher | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 74 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 28% |
| Psychology | 24 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 11% |
| Unknown | 85 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,513,101
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,066
of 13,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,125
of 363,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#164
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.