↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Zinc supplementation for improving pregnancy and infant outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
390 Mendeley
Title
Zinc supplementation for improving pregnancy and infant outcome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000230.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erika Ota, Rintaro Mori, Philippa Middleton, Ruoyan Tobe-Gai, Kassam Mahomed, Celine Miyazaki, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Abstract

It has been suggested that low serum zinc levels may be associated with suboptimal outcomes of pregnancy such as prolonged labour, atonic postpartum haemorrhage, pregnancy-induced hypertension, preterm labour and post-term pregnancies, although many of these associations have not yet been established.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 380 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 60 15%
Student > Master 53 14%
Student > Bachelor 49 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 12%
Other 25 6%
Other 74 19%
Unknown 83 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 133 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 14%
Social Sciences 23 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 5%
Other 47 12%
Unknown 90 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#615,202
of 18,846,561 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,433
of 11,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,396
of 304,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,846,561 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.