↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vaccines for prophylaxis of viral infections in patients with hematological malignancies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Vaccines for prophylaxis of viral infections in patients with hematological malignancies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006505.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel KL Cheuk, Alan KS Chiang, Tsz Leung Lee, Godfrey CF Chan, Shau Yin Ha

Abstract

Viral infections cause significant morbidity and mortality in patients with hematological malignancies. It remains uncertain whether viral vaccinations in these patients are supported by good evidence.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 125 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 19%
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 29 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 30 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,761,012
of 17,719,454 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,178
of 11,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,612
of 297,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#172
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,719,454 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.