| Title |
Neuroreflexotherapy for non-specific low-back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003009.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerard Urrútia, A Kim Burton, Antoni Morral Fernández, Xavier Bonfill Cosp, Gustavo Zanoli |
| Abstract |
Among the wide range of therapeutic alternatives proposed for the management of low-back pain (LBP), a less widely used technique from Spain, called neuroreflexotherapy (NRT) has claimed to show very favourable results, mainly in patients with chronic low-back pain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 58 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Psychology | 9 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 64 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,005,357
of 23,330,477 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,428
of 12,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,805
of 59,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,330,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.