↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Red cell transfusion for the management of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Red cell transfusion for the management of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006613.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vipul Jairath, Sarah Hearnshaw, Susan J Brunskill, Carolyn Doree, Sally Hopewell, Chris Hyde, Simon Travis, Michael F Murphy

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 90 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Other 9 10%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 20 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,486,051
of 17,353,889 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,212
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,202
of 295,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#141
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,353,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.