↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Red cell transfusion for the management of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Summary Policy documents Wikipedia Dimensions citations
Title
Red cell transfusion for the management of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006613.pub3
Pubmed ID
20824851
Authors

Vipul Jairath, Sarah Hearnshaw, Susan J Brunskill, Carolyn Doree, Sally Hopewell, Chris Hyde, Simon Travis, Michael F Murphy

View on publisher site

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 110 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 9 8%
Researcher 9 8%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 35 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 38 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,449,685
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,227
of 12,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,558
of 97,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.