↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Three- or four- versus two-drug antiretroviral maintenance regimens for HIV infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Three- or four- versus two-drug antiretroviral maintenance regimens for HIV infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002037
Pubmed ID
Authors

George W Rutherford, Prerana Sangani, Gail E Kennedy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 20 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 23 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,942
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,828
of 51,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.