↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mobile-based technologies to support client to healthcare provider communication and management of care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Mobile-based technologies to support client to healthcare provider communication and management of care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012928
Authors

Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley, Brian S Buckley, Marita S Fønhus, Claire Glenton, Nicholas Henschke, Simon Lewin, Nicola Maayan, Garrett L Mehl, Tigest Tamrat, Sasha Shepperd

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Librarian 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Social Sciences 4 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 9 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,110,226
of 17,366,233 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,578
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,917
of 375,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#149
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,366,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.