↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Maternity waiting facilities for improving maternal and neonatal outcome in low-resource countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
Title
Maternity waiting facilities for improving maternal and neonatal outcome in low-resource countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006759.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luc van Lonkhuijzen, Jelle Stekelenburg, Jos van Roosmalen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 263 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 102 38%
Student > Postgraduate 24 9%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 6%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 43 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 19%
Social Sciences 31 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 54 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2015.
All research outputs
#2,819,871
of 17,353,889 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,461
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,227
of 294,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#125
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,353,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.