↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Maternity waiting facilities for improving maternal and neonatal outcome in low-resource countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
309 Mendeley
Title
Maternity waiting facilities for improving maternal and neonatal outcome in low-resource countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006759.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luc van Lonkhuijzen, Jelle Stekelenburg, Jos van Roosmalen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 303 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 106 34%
Researcher 29 9%
Student > Postgraduate 25 8%
Student > Bachelor 22 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 6%
Other 41 13%
Unknown 67 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 18%
Social Sciences 31 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 78 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2015.
All research outputs
#3,781,781
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,279
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,857
of 175,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#113
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.