The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004148.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eileen FS Kaner, Fiona R Beyer, Colin Muirhead, Fiona Campbell, Elizabeth D Pienaar, Nicolas Bertholet, Jean B Daeppen, John B Saunders, Bernard Burnand |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 14% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 3 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 45 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 11% |
| Scientists | 7 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 924 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 917 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 115 | 12% |
| Researcher | 113 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 95 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 8% |
| Other | 49 | 5% |
| Other | 168 | 18% |
| Unknown | 310 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 211 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 97 | 10% |
| Psychology | 88 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 53 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 111 | 12% |
| Unknown | 349 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 188. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#227,175
of 26,576,308 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#369
of 13,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,012
of 348,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,576,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.