↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the preoperative locoregional staging of primary gastric cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the preoperative locoregional staging of primary gastric cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009944.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Mocellin, Sandro Pasquali

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 215 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Other 18 8%
Other 46 21%
Unknown 50 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Psychology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 61 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2015.
All research outputs
#2,130,010
of 20,927,597 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,710
of 12,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,422
of 319,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#105
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,927,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.