↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following treatments for cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for sexual dysfunction following treatments for cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005540.pub2
Authors

Clare Miles, Bridget Candy, Louise Jones, Rachael Williams, Adrian Tookman, Michael King

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 99 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 21%
Student > Master 13 13%
Other 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 42%
Psychology 12 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 24 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,589,791
of 23,398,349 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,239
of 12,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,848
of 76,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,398,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.