↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
259 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006375.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 27%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Psychology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 6 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2015.
All research outputs
#2,208,937
of 17,625,695 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,911
of 11,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,873
of 297,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,625,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.