| Title |
Cognitive‐behavioural interventions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010840.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pablo Luis Lopez, Fernando Manuel Torrente, Agustín Ciapponi, Alicia Graciela Lischinsky, Marcelo Cetkovich‐Bakmas, Juan Ignacio Rojas, Marina Romano, Facundo F Manes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 11% |
| Spain | 8 | 11% |
| Argentina | 7 | 10% |
| Paraguay | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 61 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 10% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 520 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 520 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 67 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 12% |
| Researcher | 47 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 7% |
| Other | 96 | 18% |
| Unknown | 177 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 117 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 55 | 11% |
| Unknown | 199 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2023.
All research outputs
#564,164
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#993
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,821
of 349,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.