↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Danazol for uterine fibroids

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Danazol for uterine fibroids
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007692.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin ‐qiu Ke, Kun Yang, Chun‐Mei Li, Jing Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 100 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 39 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Psychology 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 40 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,387,249
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,415
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,273
of 121,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.