| Title |
Different communication strategies for disclosing results of diagnostic prenatal testing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007750.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Faris Mujezinovic, Anica Prosnik, Zarko Alfirevic |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 24% |
| Psychology | 24 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 36 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,553,524
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,018
of 12,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,588
of 101,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.