↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Different communication strategies for disclosing results of diagnostic prenatal testing

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Different communication strategies for disclosing results of diagnostic prenatal testing
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007750.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faris Mujezinovic, Anica Prosnik, Zarko Alfirevic

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 94 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 28%
Psychology 23 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 20 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,733,961
of 12,761,472 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,892
of 10,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,573
of 273,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#152
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,761,472 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.