↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Biologics, colchicine, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants and interferon-alpha for Neuro-Behçet's Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Biologics, colchicine, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants and interferon-alpha for Neuro-Behçet's Syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010729.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Nava, Francesca Ghilotti, Lorenzo Maggi, Gulen Hatemi, Alessandra Del Bianco, Chiara Merlo, Graziella Filippini, Irene Tramacere

Abstract

Neuro-Behçet Syndrome (NBS) is a severe chronic inflammatory vascular disease involving the Central Nervous System (CNS), and it is an invalidating condition with disability and a huge impact on quality of life. Recommendations on treatments for NBS include the use of disease-modifying therapies in general, although they are not supported by a systematic review of the evidence.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 114 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 40 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Psychology 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 44 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,943
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,503
of 353,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#217
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.