↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing posterior capsule opacification

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for preventing posterior capsule opacification
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003738.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver Findl, Wolf Buehl, Peter Bauer, Thomas Sycha

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 183 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 14%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Other 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Chemistry 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 47 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#9,014,342
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,822
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,088
of 107,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.