↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing posterior capsule opacification

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for preventing posterior capsule opacification
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003738.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver Findl, Wolf Buehl, Peter Bauer, Thomas Sycha

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Other 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 36 22%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 32 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,020
of 12,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,056
of 94,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.