↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Methylxanthines for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Methylxanthines for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002168
Pubmed ID
Authors

R Graham Barr, Brian H Rowe, Carlos A Camargo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 118 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 33 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 34 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2022.
All research outputs
#914,933
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,985
of 12,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#775
of 50,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.