↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fluphenazine decanoate (depot) and enanthate for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
Title
Fluphenazine decanoate (depot) and enanthate for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000307.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Maayan, Seema N Quraishi, Anthony David, Aprajita Jayaswal, Maurice Eisenbruch, John Rathbone, Rosie Asher, Clive E Adams

Abstract

Intramuscular injections (depot preparations) offer an advantage over oral medication for treating schizophrenia by reducing poor compliance. The benefits gained by long-acting preparations, however, may be offset by a higher incidence of adverse effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 297 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 15%
Student > Bachelor 39 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 10%
Researcher 28 9%
Other 17 6%
Other 53 18%
Unknown 87 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 10%
Psychology 29 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 5%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 96 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#20,537,399
of 26,109,760 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,140
of 13,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,341
of 364,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#242
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,109,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.