↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fluphenazine decanoate (depot) and enanthate for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
Title
Fluphenazine decanoate (depot) and enanthate for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000307.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Maayan, Seema N Quraishi, Anthony David, Aprajita Jayaswal, Maurice Eisenbruch, John Rathbone, Rosie Asher, Clive E Adams

Abstract

Intramuscular injections (depot preparations) offer an advantage over oral medication for treating schizophrenia by reducing poor compliance. The benefits gained by long-acting preparations, however, may be offset by a higher incidence of adverse effects.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 233 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 18%
Student > Bachelor 32 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 12%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 48 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 27%
Psychology 27 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 7%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 57 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2015.
All research outputs
#9,712,997
of 12,667,698 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,270
of 10,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,407
of 216,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#237
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,667,698 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.