↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fluphenazine decanoate (depot) and enanthate for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
Title
Fluphenazine decanoate (depot) and enanthate for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000307.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Maayan, Seema N Quraishi, Anthony David, Aprajita Jayaswal, Maurice Eisenbruch, John Rathbone, Rosie Asher, Clive E Adams

Abstract

Intramuscular injections (depot preparations) offer an advantage over oral medication for treating schizophrenia by reducing poor compliance. The benefits gained by long-acting preparations, however, may be offset by a higher incidence of adverse effects.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 262 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 17%
Student > Bachelor 37 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 62 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 11%
Psychology 28 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 6%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 70 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2015.
All research outputs
#17,748,987
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,278
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,158
of 352,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#243
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.