↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Conservative interventions for preventing clinically detectable upper-limb lymphoedema in patients who are at risk of developing lymphoedema after breast cancer therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
493 Mendeley
Title
Conservative interventions for preventing clinically detectable upper-limb lymphoedema in patients who are at risk of developing lymphoedema after breast cancer therapy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009765.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martijn M Stuiver, Marieke R ten Tusscher, Carla S Agasi-Idenburg, Cees Lucas, Neil K Aaronson, Patrick MM Bossuyt

Abstract

Breast cancer-related lymphoedema can be a debilitating long-term sequela of breast cancer treatment. Several studies have investigated the effectiveness of different treatment strategies to reduce the risk of breast cancer-related lymphoedema.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 493 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 488 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 95 19%
Student > Bachelor 61 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 10%
Unspecified 33 7%
Researcher 33 7%
Other 103 21%
Unknown 118 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 106 22%
Unspecified 33 7%
Sports and Recreations 23 5%
Psychology 16 3%
Other 52 11%
Unknown 132 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,611,148
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,683
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,351
of 358,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.