| Title |
Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004690.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony C James, Georgina James, Felicity A Cowdrey, Angela Soler, Aislinn Choke |
| Abstract |
A previous Cochrane review (James 2005) showed that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) was effective in treating childhood anxiety disorders; however, questions remain regarding (1) the relative efficacy of CBT versus non-CBT active treatments; (2) the relative efficacy of CBT versus medication and the combination of CBT and medication versus placebo; and (3) the long-term effects of CBT. OBJECTIVES: To examine (1) whether CBT is an effective treatment for childhood and adolescent anxiety disorders in comparison with (a) wait-list controls; (b) active non-CBT treatments (i.e. psychological placebo, bibliotherapy and treatment as usual (TAU)); and (c) medication and the combination of medication and CBT versus placebo; and (2) the long-term effects of CBT. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 19% |
| Spain | 8 | 10% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 28 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 68% |
| Scientists | 16 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 789 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 781 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 147 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 122 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 80 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 71 | 9% |
| Researcher | 65 | 8% |
| Other | 128 | 16% |
| Unknown | 176 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 285 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 127 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 48 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 62 | 8% |
| Unknown | 193 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2023.
All research outputs
#632,340
of 24,285,692 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,211
of 12,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,922
of 259,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,285,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.