↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009461.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Bosteels, Jenneke Kasius, Steven Weyers, Frank J Broekmans, Ben Willem J Mol, Thomas M D'Hooghe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 175 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 12%
Other 18 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 53 30%
Unknown 34 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Psychology 11 6%
Unspecified 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 41 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,754,256
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,635
of 12,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,225
of 256,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.