↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
149 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1502 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1426 Mendeley
Title
Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003793.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard McCarthy, Dympna Casey, Declan Devane, Kathy Murphy, Edel Murphy, Yves Lacasse

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 149 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 1418 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 223 16%
Student > Bachelor 222 16%
Researcher 118 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 116 8%
Student > Postgraduate 68 5%
Other 226 16%
Unknown 453 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 380 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 292 20%
Sports and Recreations 50 4%
Psychology 37 3%
Social Sciences 28 2%
Other 150 11%
Unknown 489 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#289,592
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#482
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,264
of 270,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.