↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
154 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
858 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
912 Mendeley
Title
Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003793.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard McCarthy, Dympna Casey, Declan Devane, Kathy Murphy, Edel Murphy, Yves Lacasse

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 154 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 912 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 903 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 183 20%
Student > Bachelor 157 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 10%
Researcher 84 9%
Student > Postgraduate 59 6%
Other 175 19%
Unknown 161 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 303 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 216 24%
Sports and Recreations 35 4%
Psychology 27 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 3%
Other 104 11%
Unknown 201 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#177,828
of 17,641,103 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#337
of 11,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,699
of 222,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,641,103 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.