↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
156 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1180 Mendeley
Title
Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003793.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard McCarthy, Dympna Casey, Declan Devane, Kathy Murphy, Edel Murphy, Yves Lacasse

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 156 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 1171 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 209 18%
Student > Bachelor 201 17%
Researcher 102 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 9%
Student > Postgraduate 64 5%
Other 204 17%
Unknown 299 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 345 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 266 23%
Sports and Recreations 50 4%
Psychology 34 3%
Social Sciences 27 2%
Other 128 11%
Unknown 330 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#227,421
of 21,751,441 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#379
of 12,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,830
of 231,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,751,441 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.