| Title |
Morita therapy for anxiety disorders in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008619.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hui Wu, Dehua Yu, Yanling He, Jijun Wang, Zeping Xiao, Chunbo Li |
| Abstract |
Morita therapy, first proposed in 1919, is a systematic psychological therapy for anxiety disorders that is based on eastern philosophy. It is mainly used as an alternative therapy for anxiety disorders in Asian countries such as Japan and China. Varying foci of treatment outcomes have been reported. To date, there has been no systematic review to investigate the strength of evidence for Morita therapy in anxiety disorders. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 46% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 297 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 14% |
| Researcher | 38 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 46 | 15% |
| Unknown | 80 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 69 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 12% |
| Unknown | 92 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,200,914
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,720
of 12,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,375
of 259,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.