↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for vitiligo

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
438 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for vitiligo
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003263.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maxine E Whitton, Mariona Pinart, Jonathan Batchelor, Jo Leonardi-Bee, Urbà González, Zainab Jiyad, Viktoria Eleftheriadou, Khaled Ezzedine

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 438 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Unknown 433 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 86 20%
Student > Bachelor 56 13%
Researcher 42 10%
Student > Postgraduate 34 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 8%
Other 88 20%
Unknown 99 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 186 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 7%
Psychology 26 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Other 50 11%
Unknown 114 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2022.
All research outputs
#843,099
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,808
of 12,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,275
of 256,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.