Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Katharine Ker, Gavin Tansley, Deirdre Beecher, Anders Perner, Haleema Shakur, Tim Harris, Ian Roberts
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||5||83%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||17%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||30||18%|
|Student > Master||25||15%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||14||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||62||36%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||29||17%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||5||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2015.
All research outputs
of 23,485,953 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 256,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,953 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.