↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Muscle energy technique for non‐specific low‐back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
636 Mendeley
Title
Muscle energy technique for non‐specific low‐back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009852.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helge Franke, Gary Fryer, Raymond WJG Ostelo, Steven J Kamper

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 636 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 635 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 109 17%
Student > Bachelor 95 15%
Researcher 47 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 6%
Other 116 18%
Unknown 190 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 183 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 117 18%
Sports and Recreations 19 3%
Psychology 18 3%
Neuroscience 12 2%
Other 76 12%
Unknown 211 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2023.
All research outputs
#753,149
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,330
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,849
of 271,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.