↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
190 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
326 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
826 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010523.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Coulter, Vikki A Entwistle, Abi Eccles, Sara Ryan, Sasha Shepperd, Rafael Perera

Abstract

Personalised care planning is a collaborative process used in chronic condition management in which patients and clinicians identify and discuss problems caused by or related to the patient's condition, and develop a plan for tackling these. In essence it is a conversation, or series of conversations, in which they jointly agree goals and actions for managing the patient's condition.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 190 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 826 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 809 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 147 18%
Researcher 111 13%
Student > Bachelor 105 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 105 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 48 6%
Other 156 19%
Unknown 154 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 235 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 159 19%
Psychology 63 8%
Social Sciences 56 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 2%
Other 110 13%
Unknown 186 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 151. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#156,112
of 17,838,103 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#294
of 11,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,321
of 222,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,838,103 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.