↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cephalic version by postural management for breech presentation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cephalic version by postural management for breech presentation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000051.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

G Justus Hofmeyr, Regina Kulier

Abstract

Babies with breech presentation (bottom first) are at increased risk of complications during birth, and are often delivered by caesarean section. The chance of breech presentation persisting at the time of delivery, and the risk of caesarean section, can be reduced by external cephalic version (ECV - turning the baby by manual manipulation through the mother's abdomen). It is also possible that maternal posture may influence fetal position. Many postural techniques have been used to promote cephalic version.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 155 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 20%
Student > Master 22 14%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 45 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 51 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,099,454
of 26,205,030 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,268
of 13,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,849
of 195,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,205,030 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.