↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chlorhexidine skin or cord care for prevention of mortality and infections in neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
48 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
Title
Chlorhexidine skin or cord care for prevention of mortality and infections in neonates
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007835.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anju Sinha, Sunil Sazawal, Alok Pradhan, Siddarth Ramji, Newton Opiyo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 246 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 10%
Researcher 24 10%
Student > Postgraduate 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 56 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 16%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Psychology 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 68 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2016.
All research outputs
#341,488
of 21,358,488 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#638
of 12,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,492
of 231,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,358,488 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.