| Title |
Chlorhexidine skin or cord care for prevention of mortality and infections in neonates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007835.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anju Sinha, Sunil Sazawal, Alok Pradhan, Siddarth Ramji, Newton Opiyo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 18% |
| Spain | 7 | 16% |
| Argentina | 3 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 22% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 278 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 18% |
| Researcher | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 54 | 19% |
| Unknown | 75 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Unknown | 89 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#463,001
of 24,834,604 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#832
of 12,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,519
of 262,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,834,604 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.