↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio-economically disadvantaged children aged three months to five years

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
52 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
813 Mendeley
Title
Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio-economically disadvantaged children aged three months to five years
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009924.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Kristjansson, Damian K Francis, Selma Liberato, Maria Benkhalti Jandu, Vivian Welch, Malek Batal, Trish Greenhalgh, Tamara Rader, Eamonn Noonan, Beverley Shea, Laura Janzen, George A Wells, Mark Petticrew

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 813 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 806 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 138 17%
Researcher 102 13%
Student > Bachelor 72 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 9%
Unspecified 48 6%
Other 171 21%
Unknown 211 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 198 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 105 13%
Social Sciences 66 8%
Unspecified 49 6%
Psychology 45 6%
Other 112 14%
Unknown 238 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2021.
All research outputs
#902,187
of 24,325,299 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,865
of 12,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,568
of 262,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,325,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.