↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio-economically disadvantaged children aged three months to five years

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
54 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
590 Mendeley
Title
Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio-economically disadvantaged children aged three months to five years
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009924.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Kristjansson, Damian K Francis, Selma Liberato, Maria Benkhalti Jandu, Vivian Welch, Malek Batal, Trish Greenhalgh, Tamara Rader, Eamonn Noonan, Beverley Shea, Laura Janzen, George A Wells, Mark Petticrew

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 590 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 582 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 123 21%
Researcher 89 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 11%
Student > Bachelor 58 10%
Student > Postgraduate 32 5%
Other 106 18%
Unknown 120 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 175 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 88 15%
Social Sciences 59 10%
Psychology 37 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 3%
Other 69 12%
Unknown 145 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#615,314
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,537
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,996
of 222,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.