↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Honey as a topical treatment for wounds

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
199 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
18 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
803 Mendeley
Title
Honey as a topical treatment for wounds
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005083.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew B Jull, Nicky Cullum, Jo C Dumville, Maggie J Westby, Sohan Deshpande, Natalie Walker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 199 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 803 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 787 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 152 19%
Student > Master 147 18%
Researcher 88 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 8%
Student > Postgraduate 60 7%
Other 142 18%
Unknown 151 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 251 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 168 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 30 4%
Other 100 12%
Unknown 179 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 302. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#63,299
of 17,944,974 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 11,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#915
of 224,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,944,974 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.