↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Alternatives to inpatient mental health care for children and young people

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
377 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Alternatives to inpatient mental health care for children and young people
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006410.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sasha Shepperd, Helen Doll, Simon Gowers, Anthony James, Mina Fazel, Ray Fitzpatrick, Jon Pollock

Abstract

Current policy in the UK and elsewhere places emphasis on the provision of mental health services in the least restrictive setting, whilst also recognising that some children will require inpatient care. As a result, there are a range of mental health services to manage young people with serious mental health problems who are at risk of being admitted to an inpatient unit in community or outpatient settings.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 377 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 367 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 73 19%
Researcher 51 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 13%
Student > Bachelor 45 12%
Student > Postgraduate 23 6%
Other 68 18%
Unknown 67 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 26%
Psychology 61 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 15%
Social Sciences 37 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 2%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 83 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,086,990
of 16,903,486 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,814
of 11,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,750
of 107,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,903,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.