↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstinence‐only programs for HIV infection prevention in high‐income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
30 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
354 Mendeley
Title
Abstinence‐only programs for HIV infection prevention in high‐income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005421.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristen Underhill, Don Operario, Paul Montgomery

Abstract

Abstinence-only interventions promote sexual abstinence as the only means of preventing sexual acquisition of HIV; they do not promote safer-sex strategies (e.g., condom use). Although abstinence-only programs are widespread, there has been no internationally focused review of their effectiveness for HIV prevention in high-income countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 346 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 19%
Researcher 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 43 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 85 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 26%
Psychology 38 11%
Social Sciences 31 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 3%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 98 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#860,039
of 26,423,535 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,542
of 13,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,426
of 90,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,423,535 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.