↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the detection of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
11 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
618 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1039 Mendeley
Title
Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the detection of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010783.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingrid Arevalo‐Rodriguez, Nadja Smailagic, Marta Roqué i Figuls, Agustín Ciapponi, Erick Sanchez‐Perez, Antri Giannakou, Olga L Pedraza, Xavier Bonfill Cosp, Sarah Cullum

Abstract

Dementia is a progressive global cognitive impairment syndrome. In 2010, more than 35 million people worldwide were estimated to be living with dementia. Some people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) will progress to dementia but others remain stable or recover full function. There is great interest in finding good predictors of dementia in people with MCI. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the best-known and the most often used short screening tool for providing an overall measure of cognitive impairment in clinical, research and community settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,039 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 1036 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 167 16%
Student > Master 145 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 108 10%
Researcher 94 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 55 5%
Other 144 14%
Unknown 326 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 214 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 103 10%
Psychology 98 9%
Neuroscience 68 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 3%
Other 168 16%
Unknown 354 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#347,194
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#587
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,981
of 273,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.