| Title |
Relaxation for depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007142.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony F Jorm, Amy J Morgan, Sarah E Hetrick |
| Abstract |
Many members of the public have negative attitudes towards antidepressants. Psychological interventions are more acceptable but require considerable therapist training. Acceptable psychological interventions that require less training and skill are needed to ensure increased uptake of intervention. A potential intervention of this sort is relaxation techniques. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 242 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 18% |
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 9% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 67 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 63 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 76 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2013.
All research outputs
#4,388,494
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,676
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,774
of 102,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.