↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Relaxation for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
Title
Relaxation for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007142.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony F Jorm, Amy J Morgan, Sarah E Hetrick

Abstract

Many members of the public have negative attitudes towards antidepressants. Psychological interventions are more acceptable but require considerable therapist training. Acceptable psychological interventions that require less training and skill are needed to ensure increased uptake of intervention. A potential intervention of this sort is relaxation techniques.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 205 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 19%
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 39 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 62 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 56 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 48 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2013.
All research outputs
#3,128,244
of 19,101,906 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,714
of 11,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,401
of 113,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,101,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.