↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to increase the use of electronic health information by healthcare practitioners to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Interventions to increase the use of electronic health information by healthcare practitioners to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004749.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Fiander, Jessie McGowan, Roland Grad, Pierre Pluye, Karin Hannes, Michel Labrecque, Nia W Roberts, Douglas M Salzwedel, Vivian Welch, Peter Tugwell

Abstract

There is a large volume of health information available, and, if applied in clinical practice, may contribute to effective patient care. Despite an abundance of information, sub-optimal care is common. Many factors influence practitioners' use of health information, and format (electronic or other) may be one such factor.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 292 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 18%
Researcher 44 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 10%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Librarian 17 6%
Other 61 20%
Unknown 64 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 17%
Psychology 20 7%
Social Sciences 17 6%
Computer Science 9 3%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 72 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#929,540
of 22,307,975 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,067
of 12,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,166
of 234,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,307,975 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.