↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for improving community ambulation in individuals with stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
362 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for improving community ambulation in individuals with stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010200.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth E Barclay, Ted J Stevenson, William Poluha, Jacquie Ripat, Cristabel Nett, Cynthia S Srikesavan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 356 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 19%
Student > Bachelor 47 13%
Researcher 41 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Other 75 21%
Unknown 63 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 78 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 77 21%
Psychology 23 6%
Social Sciences 21 6%
Neuroscience 17 5%
Other 66 18%
Unknown 80 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,632,810
of 18,017,546 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,985
of 11,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,654
of 225,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#101
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,017,546 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.