↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for improving community ambulation in individuals with stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
500 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for improving community ambulation in individuals with stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010200.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth E Barclay, Ted J Stevenson, William Poluha, Jacquie Ripat, Cristabel Nett, Cynthia S Srikesavan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 500 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 494 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 82 16%
Student > Bachelor 57 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 9%
Researcher 44 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 5%
Other 95 19%
Unknown 149 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 90 18%
Psychology 25 5%
Social Sciences 21 4%
Neuroscience 19 4%
Other 79 16%
Unknown 170 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,297,959
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,584
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,001
of 276,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#136
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.