↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for improving community ambulation in individuals with stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
438 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for improving community ambulation in individuals with stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010200.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth E Barclay, Ted J Stevenson, William Poluha, Jacquie Ripat, Cristabel Nett, Cynthia S Srikesavan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 438 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 432 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 18%
Student > Bachelor 50 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 10%
Researcher 43 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Other 90 21%
Unknown 106 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 81 18%
Psychology 25 6%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Neuroscience 19 4%
Other 81 18%
Unknown 124 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,974,169
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,338
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,116
of 260,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.