↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
191 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003556.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jude Edwards, Sally Stapley

Abstract

Foot ulceration is thought to affect 15% of people with diabetes at some time in their lives. Debridement is widely regarded as an effective intervention to speed up ulcer healing. The most effective method is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 318 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 54 16%
Student > Master 37 11%
Researcher 31 9%
Other 25 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 7%
Other 83 25%
Unknown 76 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 16%
Unspecified 15 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 91 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,110,544
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,485
of 12,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,846
of 166,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.