| Title |
Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003556.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jude Edwards, Sally Stapley |
| Abstract |
Foot ulceration is thought to affect 15% of people with diabetes at some time in their lives. Debridement is widely regarded as an effective intervention to speed up ulcer healing. The most effective method is unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 345 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 12% |
| Researcher | 31 | 9% |
| Other | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 77 | 22% |
| Unknown | 97 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 128 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 10% |
| Unknown | 113 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,269,760
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,665
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,257
of 172,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.