↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
207 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003556.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jude Edwards, Sally Stapley

Abstract

Foot ulceration is thought to affect 15% of people with diabetes at some time in their lives. Debridement is widely regarded as an effective intervention to speed up ulcer healing. The most effective method is unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 348 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 56 16%
Student > Master 41 11%
Researcher 32 9%
Other 28 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 6%
Other 78 22%
Unknown 100 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 127 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 35 10%
Unknown 116 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,318,291
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,621
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,414
of 176,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.