↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Duration of antibacterial treatment for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Duration of antibacterial treatment for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004682.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gai Milo, Eugene Katchman, Mical Paul, Thierry Christiaens, Anders Baerheim, Leonard Leibovici

Abstract

Uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common disease, occurring frequently in young sexually active women. In the past, seven day antibiotic therapy was recommended while the current practice is to treat uncomplicated UTI for three days.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 133 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Other 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 37 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 42 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#918,692
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,663
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,055
of 70,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.