| Title |
Duration of antibacterial treatment for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004682.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gai Milo, Eugene Katchman, Mical Paul, Thierry Christiaens, Anders Baerheim, Leonard Leibovici |
| Abstract |
Uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common disease, occurring frequently in young sexually active women. In the past, seven day antibiotic therapy was recommended while the current practice is to treat uncomplicated UTI for three days. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 21% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#854,661
of 25,463,724 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,665
of 13,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#979
of 69,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.