↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Corneal collagen cross-linking for treating keratoconus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Corneal collagen cross-linking for treating keratoconus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010621.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evripidis Sykakis, Rushmia Karim, Jennifer R Evans, Catey Bunce, Kwesi N Amissah-Arthur, Showrob Patwary, Peter J McDonnell, Samer Hamada

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 31 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,379,793
of 17,355,315 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,511
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,773
of 230,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,355,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.