| Title |
Topical analgesia for acute otitis media
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005657.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth Foxlee, Ann-Charlott Johansson, Jessika Wejfalk, Liz Dooley, Chris B Del Mar |
| Abstract |
Acute otitis media (AOM) is a spontaneously remitting disease for which pain is the most distressing symptom. Antibiotics are now known to have less benefit than previously assumed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 188 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 16% |
| Researcher | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 19% |
| Unknown | 43 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 52 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,438,664
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,224
of 12,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,403
of 66,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.