Title |
Endotracheal intubation at birth for preventing morbidity and mortality in vigorous, meconium-stained infants born at term
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000500 |
Authors |
Henry L Halliday, David G Sweet |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 114 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 18% |
Researcher | 14 | 12% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
Other | 22 | 19% |
Unknown | 29 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 54% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
Psychology | 5 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Unknown | 32 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#5,647,246
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,505
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,345
of 113,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.