↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008239.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

DongHao Lu, Xuan Wang, Gang Shi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 133 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Other 15 11%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 24 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 35 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,791,247
of 16,164,211 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,444
of 11,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,803
of 227,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#174
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,164,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.