↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008239.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

DongHao Lu, Xuan Wang, Gang Shi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 20%
Other 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Researcher 15 10%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 13%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 46 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,952,116
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,566
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,918
of 263,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#191
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.