↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dietary advice with or without oral nutritional supplements for disease-related malnutrition in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
452 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Dietary advice with or without oral nutritional supplements for disease-related malnutrition in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002008.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Baldwin, Christine Elizabeth Weekes

Abstract

Disease-related malnutrition has been reported in 10% to 55% of people in hospital and the community. Dietary advice encouraging the use of energy- and nutrient-rich foods rather than oral nutritional supplements has been suggested as the initial approach for managing disease-related malnutrition.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 441 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 86 19%
Student > Bachelor 77 17%
Researcher 46 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 10%
Student > Postgraduate 35 8%
Other 80 18%
Unknown 82 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 154 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 73 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 7%
Social Sciences 23 5%
Psychology 16 4%
Other 52 12%
Unknown 103 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2018.
All research outputs
#5,104,438
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,578
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,221
of 109,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.